Was it worth attending? Was it memorable? Will you talk about it later? The best take-away for any article you read is to be able to use some of the material yourself in your own writing.
Make your own point, using the words of the author you read. Stand on some shoulders, will you? Read the article all the way through. Set it aside and think about it. Sign in to continue to Google Sites Then read it again. This time, using a pen or highlighter, underline outline outline points in each paragraph.
Focus on what Tugend is telling her reader in each paragraph. Then summary at your list. Tugend may analysis several points together in a few paragraphs. Circle or block essay those points that seem to connect to each other. Her overall essay is a major point for that part of the article. Give that block of points a title. This is one main point of the article. It is. If you were to outline a presentation on multi-tasking in a public speaking class, you could use her article alone to inform your audience of multi-tasking.
This is the first step to creating a summary. Since summaries are often used in research essay, outline check out the author. Who is the audience? Is it effectively written for that audience? If you've done a literary analysis, you can apply what you know about analyzing literature to analyzing other texts. You will want to consider what is effective and ineffective.
You will analyze what the author does that works and what doesn't work to support the author's point and persuade the audience to agree. Analysis requires knowing who the author is trying to persuade and what he or she wants the audience to think, do, or believe. Source Using TRACE for Analysis Sometimes, especially when you're just getting started writing, the task of fitting a huge topic into an essay may feel daunting and you may not know where to start.
When writing the analysis, you need to think about what kind of text it is and what the author wanted to have the audience think, do, or believe. The main question your analysis will answer is, "How effective was the author at convincing that particular audience? In this context, Exigence is synonymous with "assumptions," "bias," or "worldview.
In your paper, you'll probably want to address from three to all five of these elements. Sample Response I think that this essay is very thought-provoking even though I do not think Morrow clearly connects his examples to his thesis, and I think his explanations are weak throughout.
I also think that his choice of is rather arbitrary for some of the examples. For instance, Kennedy found out about his illness in and concealed it until his death, so why focus on ? Our current adversarial politics and distrust in politicians do seem to be rooted back in the Vietnam era and Watergate, the era when these three Presidents were in charge of our country.
Source This essay is one that I compiled from all the suggestions given during an in-class assignment with my college class after reading "The Year That Changed Everything. This essay could be used in discussing topics like: What is the most pivotal year in the last century? He has since had great success in working with patients by helping them locate in their own lives meanings of love, work, and suffering. The Capos were prisoners who acted as trustees, and Frankl says they acted more cruelly toward the prisoners than the guards or the SS men.
Several psychological factors help explain this cruelty. Frankl and other prisoners must have been a constant reminder to the Capos of the courage and integrity they themselves lacked. When our behaviors and values are threatened by someone else acting in a different way, one way we may react is with anger and aggression. The Capos are an extreme example of how, if the situation is right, we may be capable of great cruelty to those whose actions threaten our standards.
Many people are unhappy because they are caught in jobs where they have no responsibility and creativity; their work lacks meaning. Many are also unhappy because our culture seems to stress sexual technique in social relationships rather than human caring. Where there is no real care, there is no meaning. To hide the inner emptiness that results from impersonal work and sex, people busy themselves with the accumulation of material things.
With television sets, stereos, cars, expensive clothes, and the like, they try to forget that their lives lack true meaning instead of working or going to school to get a meaningful job, or trying to be decent human beings. I have a friend named Jim who was always poor and did not have much of a family—only a stepmother who never cared for him as much as for her own children. What Jim did have, though, was determination.
He worked two jobs to save money to go to school, and then worked and went to school at the same time. The fact that his life was hard seemed to make him bear down all the more. On the other hand, I can think of a man in my neighborhood who for all the years I've known him has done nothing with his life.
Or maybe you need to qualify your original idea. You can state the name of the article and when and where it was published as well.
If you find what you want, you expect to be fed, right? Should you change your original idea? Read the paper and make marks on the draft about: grammar and spelling errors what you think is good where they need more support where they need better transitions where they need more explanation or description II. This is one main point of the article. Yes, an introduction isn't a central part of the essay, but it gets the audience acquainted with your writing and gives a certain picture of it.
Where were the sources published?
What makes you think this? Check out the language used: What summary are most likely to be interested in the article? Should Presidents have secrets? Does the author explain enough about the history of this argument? With television sets, stereos, cars, expensive clothes, and the like, they try to forget that their lives lack true meaning instead of working or going to school to get a meaningful job, or trying to be decent human beings. If the article merely rehashes the ideas of one or two people without using those ideas to see the issue from another perspective, then perhaps the article has not contributed to the body of work currently available.