If you have read in this active way, putting together the book review should be quick and straightforward. Paper and pen provides a little friction to prevent such drifting. Take particular note of the title does the book deliver what the title suggests it is going to deliver? Does the book do what it says it is going to do? Is the book a contribution to the field or discipline?
Does the book relate to a current debate or trend in the field and if so, how? What is the theoretical lineage or school of thought out of which the book rises? Is the book well-written? What are the books terms and are they defined? How accurate is the information e. Are the illustrations helpful? If there are no illustrations, should there have been? Who would benefit from reading this book? How does the book compare to other books in the field? The author argues that the history of public library patronage, and moreover, of cultural patronage, should be re-read and possibly re-framed given the evidence presented in this chapter.
As a book reviewer you will be expected to evaluate this argument and the underlying scholarship. There are two common types of academic book reviews: short summary reviews, which are descriptive, and essay-length critical reviews. There, you can find a template of a review and a list of criteria that should be applied to its format. Time dedicated for this process can make your writing nice and easy. On the other hand, if you are a reader who wants to choose some books for reading, you may visit the website of the New York Times magazine.
There, you can find the reviews of numerous books, including the fantasy, history, and the American top ones. The New York Times provides recommended reviews as well as book review podcast. Moreover, there are many articles on books for children.
Therefore, besides reading top interesting news on the New York Times website, you will also be able to choose the book by taste and use some reviews as examples. Except the New York Times magazine website, there is the New York Review of Books webpage which specializes of the reviews specifically.
The company is based in New York City. On the New York Review of Books website, you will find a feedback on almost any book. Moreover, it has an issue archive which begins with the year What issues are omitted? They are also written by experts, academics, journalists, organisations with vested interests and students to develop an understanding of the place of a particular book within a broader context of its subject area and its genre.
This comparative component to a book review requires knowledge of both these areas. As a student you will be expected to demonstrate that you have examined the book from several angles. The points you raise both positive and negative need to be supported with evidence just as for other forms of academic writing. Make sure you add such information to the final paragraph.
Only Qualified Specialists Order Now If you want to learn how to write a book review or analyze any other piece of art, you need to avoid common mistakes, which may greatly influence the outcome. Make sure you go through your reviews over and over again before creating a final draft to eliminate all possible mistakes and flaws. Your choice of context informs your argument. The thesis of the book. If you are reviewing fiction, this may be difficult since novels, plays, and short stories rarely have explicit arguments.
Your thesis about the book. Summary of content This should be brief, as analysis takes priority. The necessary amount of summary also depends on your audience. Graduate students, beware! If, on the other hand, your audience has already read the book—such as a class assignment on the same work—you may have more liberty to explore more subtle points and to emphasize your own argument. See our handout on summary for more tips.
Analysis and evaluation of the book Your analysis and evaluation should be organized into paragraphs that deal with single aspects of your argument.
This arrangement can be challenging when your purpose is to consider the book as a whole, but it can help you differentiate elements of your criticism and pair assertions with evidence more clearly. You do not necessarily need to work chronologically through the book as you discuss it.
Given the argument you want to make, you can organize your paragraphs more usefully by themes, methods, or other elements of the book. If you find it useful to include comparisons to other books, keep them brief so that the book under review remains in the spotlight.
Avoid excessive quotation and give a specific page reference in parentheses when you do quote. Conclusion Sum up or restate your thesis or make the final judgment regarding the book. You should not introduce new evidence for your argument in the conclusion. You can, however, introduce new ideas that go beyond the book if they extend the logic of your own thesis.
Did the body of your review have three negative paragraphs and one favorable one? What do they all add up to?
What should you be writing? These are rather simple basic strategies, but you might need them to better organize your writing. When writing an academic book review, start with a bibliographic citation of the book you are reviewing [e. Moreover, the student refers to an argument about feminist history in general that places the book in a specific genre and that reaches out to a general audience.
Do you find that evidence convincing? The reader has a sense of what the student expected of the book, but no sense of what the author herself set out to prove. If you are keen to write your first book review, a reactive commission is probably the way to go. Take notes and highlight major points, the sources used, and the logic of the argument presented.
You should clearly state your opinion of the work in question, and that statement will probably resemble other types of academic writing, with a thesis statement, supporting body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
Read those academic journals that list books recently received for review or recently published in their area.